Vermian biometric parameters in the normal and abnormal fetal posterior fossa: three-dimensional sonographic study.

J Ultrasound Med

Prenatal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Modena Hospital, Modena and Reggio Emilia University, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Published: October 2011

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to describe a 3-dimensional sonographic technique for evaluation of the fetal vermis and to compare vermian biometric parameters in fetuses with a normal and an abnormal posterior fossa.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted from 2006 through 2008 on 12 fetuses with an abnormal posterior fossa and 73 healthy control fetuses from 18 to 35 weeks' gestation. Three-dimensional scans of the fetal head were performed in the axial plane, using static volume contrast imaging in the C-plane. The vermian perimeter, cross-sectional area, and superoinferior diameter were measured and compared between abnormal and normal fetuses using the Wilcoxon nonparametric test. Linear regression analysis was used to describe trends of the vermis during gestation. The z scores for perimeter, cross-sectional area, and superoinferior diameter measurements in the abnormal posterior fossa group in each 2-week interval were calculated.

Results: Twelve fetuses with an abnormal posterior fossa were recruited: 3 with a Blake pouch cyst, 1 vermian cyst, 1 enlarged cisterna magna, 2 Dandy-Walker malformation, 4 partial vermian agenesis, and 1 hemicerebellar hypoplasia. The vermian cross-sectional area was reduced significantly in the fetuses with an abnormal posterior fossa compared with the control fetuses starting at 18 to 19 weeks' gestation (P = .01); the mean vermian superoinferior diameter was lower only from 22 to 23 weeks (P = .01); and the mean vermian perimeter was decreased from 28-29 weeks' gestation (P = .03). Linear regression analysis of the parameters showed that fetuses with an abnormal posterior fossa had a statistically significantly lower growth rate than control fetuses during gestation (P < .001).

Conclusions: Measurements of the cross-sectional area were more useful than those of the perimeter and superoinferior diameter in distinguishing between fetuses with a normal and an abnormal posterior fossa during the early stages of gestation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.10.1403DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

posterior fossa
28
abnormal posterior
28
fetuses abnormal
16
cross-sectional area
16
superoinferior diameter
16
normal abnormal
12
control fetuses
12
weeks' gestation
12
fetuses
10
abnormal
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!