A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The anti-tumour effect of cisplatin and ifosfamide on xenografted squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is schedule-dependent. | LitMetric

The role of chemotherapy (CHX) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has been expanding. Although combination chemotherapy regimens regularly produce significantly high response rates, meta-analyses show little benefit regarding final outcome. One way to improve induction CHX is to improve drug combinations and schedules for CHX. Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most active drugs in the treatment of patients with SCCHN, and it is used in most combinations. Ifosfamide (IFO) is another agent that has shown activity in the treatment of patients with SCCHN. A poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma xenografted to nude mice was used. CDDP (2.5 mg/kg) and IFO (100 mg/kg) as single bolus doses induced significant retardation of tumour growth. Single drug administration was compared with CDDP given before IFO and IFO given before CDDP. Mean specific growth delay (SGD) for untreated controls was 0. For CDDP as single drug it was 1.50, for IFO as single drug it was 0.79, for CDDP given 4 h before IFO it was 1.79, and for IFO given 4 h before CDDP it was 2.90. Maximum toxicity, calculated as change in median weight at day 7, was less than 10%. The efficacy and toxicity of CDDP and IFO is schedule-dependent, with IFO given before CDDP being more effective than CDDP given before IFO. This is in contrast to most schedules used clinically. The toxicities were comparable. The number of combinations of drugs with respect to order and time interval is of a magnitude that would not be possible to test clinically. In the pursuit of more efficient combinations, the importance of order and schedule of drugs and also the potential of xenografted SSCHN are underestimated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.09.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cddp ifo
16
squamous cell
12
cell carcinoma
12
single drug
12
ifo cddp
12
cddp
10
ifo
10
carcinoma head
8
head neck
8
treatment patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!