A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of two point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for fetal lactate during labor. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates two point-of-care testing (POCT) lactate meters, StatStrip Lactate and Lactate Pro, for monitoring fetal scalp blood during labor.
  • Both devices were compared to a reference lactate method (RapidLab 860) using fetal scalp and neonatal cord blood samples, revealing differences in their accuracy and variability.
  • StatStrip Lactate exhibited better performance with smaller coefficients of variation and closer correlation to the reference method, indicating it may be the more reliable option for obstetric use among the tested devices.

Article Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) of fetal scalp blood lactate is used as an alternative for pH analysis. Lactate measurements have not been standardized and values vary with each device used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two POCT lactate meters for intrapartum use.

Methods: Analytical performance of StatStrip Lactate (Nova Biomedical) and Lactate Pro (Arkray) was evaluated using CLSI EP10. Both POCT meters were compared with our lactate reference method (RapidLab 860; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) using fetal scalp and neonatal cord blood. Deming regression analysis was performed.

Results: StatStrip Lactate coefficients of variation (CVs) were 5.1%, 5.0% and 2.6% at 0.9, 7.5 and 14.1 mmol/L lactate, respectively. CVs for Lactate Pro were 10.7%, 5.2% and 5.7% at 1.7, 4.1 and 6.4 mmol/L lactate, respectively. Consecutive lactate measurements in 37 fetal scalp and 122 cord blood samples revealed different test characteristics for the two POCT devices. In fetal scalp blood: StatStrip Lactate=1.13*RapidLab-0.39 (R(2)=0.907) and Lactate Pro=0.95*RapidLab-0.03 (R(2)=0.823). In cord artery blood: StatStrip Lactate=1.08*RapidLab-0.09 (R(2)=0.810) and Lactate Pro=0.72*RapidLab+0.59 (R(2)=0.807).

Conclusions: Overall performance of both Lactate Pro and StatStrip Lactate was good, with StatStrip Lactate having smallest CVs and closest correlation to our reference method. Both StatStrip Lactate and Lactate Pro can be used as a lactate POCT device for obstetric use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.734DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lactate
20
statstrip lactate
20
fetal scalp
16
lactate pro
16
point-of-care testing
8
testing poct
8
poct devices
8
devices fetal
8
scalp blood
8
lactate measurements
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!