A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Sensitivity to animals' allergens in people working with animals]. | LitMetric

[Sensitivity to animals' allergens in people working with animals].

Rev Alerg Mex

Centro Regional de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.

Published: April 2016

Background: Animals with fur or feathers can induce IgE-mediated reactions. From 10 to 30% of workers in laboratory animals may develop allergic symptoms by exposing to them.

Objective: To determine the frequency of sensitization to animal allergens extracts in workers of the Bioterio of the Autonomous University of Puebla.

Material And Methods: It is an observational, transversal and descriptive study, 29 subjects with animal-related professional activities were included. We performed a standardized clinical history and applied skin prick tests with allergen extracts of rat, mouse, guinea pig, rabbit, hamster, dog, cat, cattle, goat and horse hair.

Results: Twenty-nine subjects were included in the study, mean age 32.3 years, male predominance (82.8%) and years of work 6.3. Laboratory animal workers were exposed mostly to dogs (83%). Nearly half of the workers reported clinical manifestations at work. Sixty-two percent of them had at least one positive skin test to animal allergen extracts. No statistically significant association between history of atopy, seniority, clinical manifestations and positive skin tests to any allergen extract was found.

Conclusions: The majority of animal laboratory workers was found allergic to animal allergens. No statistically significant association was present between the clinical manifestations, hypersensitivity to any animal allergen extract, seniority and history of atopy. Therefore, we recommend monitoring of animal allergy for an early detection and proper treatment in laboratory animal workers.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical manifestations
12
animal
8
animal allergens
8
tests allergen
8
allergen extracts
8
laboratory animal
8
animal workers
8
positive skin
8
animal allergen
8
statistically association
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!