A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safety and efficacy of Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate: preliminary report. | LitMetric

Purpose: We ascertained the safety and efficacy of the 1,318 nm diode Eraser laser (Rolle and Rolle, Salzburg, Austria) for transurethral enucleation of the prostate. This laser has been successfully used to resect lung metastasis. It cuts and coagulates vascular rich tissue safely and effectively. We describe a prospective, randomized trial of Eraser laser prostate enucleation vs bipolar transurethral prostate resection.

Materials And Methods: A total of 60 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggesting bladder outlet obstruction and a mean prostate size of 59.5 ml on transrectal ultrasound were randomized to Eraser laser prostate enucleation or bipolar transurethral prostate resection. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: Eraser laser prostate enucleation was equivalent to bipolar transurethral prostate resection in improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximal flow rate and quality of life. Laser enucleation was significantly superior to bipolar transurethral resection for measured blood loss (mean ± SD 116.83 ± 97.02 vs 409.83 ± 148.61 ml), catheter time (mean 32.80 ± 8.74 vs 65.73 ± 13.72 hours) and hospital time (mean 45.13 ± 14.77 vs 91.20 ± 11.76 hours, each p <0.05). Using the validated Clavien-Dindo system there were 3 grade Id and 1 grade II complications.

Conclusions: Eraser laser prostate enucleation and bipolar transurethral prostate resection were equally safe and effective to relieve bladder outflow obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms. This laser technique has the advantage of less blood loss, and shorter catheter time and hospital stay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eraser laser
20
bipolar transurethral
16
laser prostate
12
prostate enucleation
12
transurethral prostate
12
prostate
10
safety efficacy
8
laser enucleation
8
enucleation prostate
8
enucleation bipolar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!