Background: The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).
Patients And Methods: Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15).
Results: Seventy-four women were treated on each arm and median PFS was 5.4 versus 5.2 months (P = 0.736), for VG and Cap, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.4 months for the VG arm and 22.4 months for the Cap arm (P = 0.319). Overall response rate was 28.4% in the VG arm and 24.3% in the Cap arm (P = 0.576). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Neutropenia and fatigue were more common with VG arm and hand-foot syndrome with Cap arm.
Conclusions: This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet over single-agent capecitabine in terms of PFS. Given the favorable toxicity and convenience of oral administration, single-agent capecitabine is recommended for compliant patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr405 | DOI Listing |
Thorac Cancer
May 2013
Interdisciplinary Thoracic Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Background: Recently, differences in tumor biology have been observed between Asian and Caucasian lung cancer patients, resulting in different sensitivities to targeted therapy. To date, all registered third-generation chemotherapeutic agents have been investigated mainly in Caucasians, but little is known whether this data can be transferred to an Asian population. The aim of this study was to provide evidence about the efficacy of chemotherapy in a Chinese population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Cancer
February 2012
Oncology Unit, S Maria Nuova Hospital, Viale Risorgimento 80, Reggio Emilia 42123, Italy.
Background: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G).
Methods: A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol
December 2011
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas Unam/Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico.
Introduction: Cervical cancer is the third most prevalent cancer in females worldwide. When advanced, the disease requires primary radiation concurrent with chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy alone is the standard treatment for recurrent/persistent/metastatic disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Oncol
May 2012
Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece. Electronic address:
Background: The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).
Patients And Methods: Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15).
J Thorac Oncol
September 2010
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Background: Previous studies investigating the effect of increased dose intensity and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not consistently shown significant survival benefits.
Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed the outcome of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC (stages III-IV) at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Regimens included cisplatin or carboplatin with either vinorelbine or gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every 21 days.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!