Introduction And Hypothesis: The aim of this study is to assess variations in practice in the use of preoperative urodynamics in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods: We performed an E-survey among all Dutch gynecologists and urologists who have SUI as focus in daily practice. The questions concerned the common policy and preferred policy. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: Of the 260 targeted specialists, 163 (63%) responded. We found that 37% of the respondents performed standard preoperative urodynamics; in the preferred practice, this would reduce to only 18%. Eighty percent indicated they would operate a patient with a positive stress test without urodynamic SUI, whereas 21% would do this also in case the clinical stress test was negative. Only 9% of the respondents indicated they adapted the choice of the type of sling based on urethral pressure profilometry parameters.

Conclusions: Urodynamics are not routinely performed, and outcomes hardly influence the choice of treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305873PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1565-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative urodynamics
12
gynecologists urologists
8
stress urinary
8
urinary incontinence
8
stress test
8
urodynamics gynecologists
4
urologists special
4
special interest
4
stress
4
interest stress
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!