A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Oropharyngeal tularemia in beta lactam-resistant cervical lymphadenitis]. | LitMetric

Objectives: This study aims emphasize oropharyngeal tularemia in the differential diagnosis of infected lymphadenopathy in the neck region.

Patients And Methods: Twenty patients (13 males, 7 females; mean age 23 years; range 9 to 43 years) diagnosed with tularemia among those who admitted to our clinic between October 2008 - October 2010 with the complaint of lymphadenopathy in the neck, and underwent treatment were included in this study. The radiological, microbiological, histopathological, and laboratory records of the patients were evaluated.

Results: All patients with lymphadenitis in neck who were diagnosed with tularemia came from rural areas. Twelve patients had a history of tonsillopharyngitis that pre-existed before the beginning of lymphadenitis or coexisted with lymphadenitis. All lymphadenopathies of the neck was localized in region II, without side predominance. All patients were diagnosed by serological testing. In 12 of the patients who developed abscesses, repeated puncture of the abscess was performed in addition to the medical treatment. Surgical drainage procedure was not applied any patient.

Conclusion: The tularemia disease should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with neck lymphadenopathy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/kbbihtisas.2011.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differential diagnosis
8
lymphadenopathy neck
8
diagnosed tularemia
8
patients
7
neck
5
[oropharyngeal tularemia
4
tularemia beta
4
beta lactam-resistant
4
lactam-resistant cervical
4
cervical lymphadenitis]
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!