A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction. | LitMetric

CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction.

Radiographics

Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.

Published: January 2012

Muscle-sparing perforator free flap breast reconstruction with the use of an inferior epigastric or gluteal perforating artery to create a vascular pedicle is increasingly popular because it obviates breast implants and results in lower donor site morbidity than breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps. The tissue harvesting procedure for a perforator free flap involves dissecting the subcutaneous fat of the anterior abdominal wall or the buttock to locate and visually evaluate the perforating arteries so as to decide which one is most suitable for the vascular pedicle. The vessel selected depends on multiple anatomic and surgical considerations, and the decision-making process can be exceptionally time-consuming, in part because of the wide variation that occurs in vascular anatomy. Preoperative imaging can greatly improve the efficiency of the selection process. Doppler ultrasonography (US) is the most frequently used modality for vascular mapping, but the results are mixed because most perforating arteries have a diameter of less than 15 mm, the threshold for reliable visualization with US. A computed tomographic (CT) angiographic evaluation performed with the use of specific postprocessing and display techniques may be more accurate for identifying the most suitable vessel. CT angiography provides valuable information that can help optimize surgical planning, decrease time spent in the operating room, and improve the outcome of breast reconstruction surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.315105089DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast reconstruction
16
perforating arteries
12
free flap
12
inferior epigastric
8
epigastric gluteal
8
gluteal perforating
8
flap breast
8
perforator free
8
vascular pedicle
8
breast
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!