Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this communication we show that the same principle that underlies the use of the isobolograph for assessing agonist interactions also leads to a method for analyzing the opposing effects of a single agonist. This is the principle of dose equivalence whose application is illustrated here and applied to the endothelium-dependent relaxing component of two putative vasoconstrictor peptides. These studies, employing angiotensin II and endothelin-1, were conducted with isolated preparations of rat aorta that were measured for agonist-induced isometric tension development in both endothelial-denuded and -intact vessels. The dose-effect relation of the relaxing component of each agonist, which should not be calculated from simple effect subtraction, was derived by the method described here.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010114 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.08.007 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!