The past 20 years of criminal law and practice have produced much heat but little light on the issue of when, if ever, the accused in a criminal case can legitimately seek disclosure of a victim's privileged files that exist exclusively in the custody of a private third party. In many jurisdictions, forced disclosure is routine, and victims must choose between justice and privacy, resulting in either the dismissal or underprosecution of serious violence or the victim's opting to forego necessary treatment. This dilemma is disproportionately imposed on women and child victims of sexual violence, and it threatens to prevent healing for a significant percentage of victimized persons. This article outlines the legal and policy interests of third parties in this debate and offers a model set of procedures to protect against needless harm to third parties, while respecting the important rights of the criminally accused.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Being honest won't pay. Seven- but not 5-year-olds begin to predict that others will lie for reputational reasons.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Children begin to manage their reputation around school-age, but it remains unclear when they start to explicitly reason about reputational strategies such as lying from a third-person perspective. The current study investigated whether 5- and 7-year-old children would explicitly predict reputational lying in the context of a third party interaction. Participants were told hypothetical stories and asked to predict whether a protagonist would lie to a peer character about a selfish resource allocation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn Early-Stage Economic Evaluation of Superabsorbent Wound Dressings for the Management of Moderately to Highly Exuding Leg Ulcers in Slovakian Settings.
Adv Skin Wound Care
January 2025
At Paul Hartmann AG, Heidenheim, Germany, Vladica M. Veličković, MD, is Head of Evidence Generation; Anna Serafin, PhD, is Senior Project Manager Clinical Investigation; Yana Arlouskaya, MS, is Project Manager Clinical Investigations; and Thurid-Christiane Milde, MBA, is Senior Manager Global HEOR Support, Wound Care. Beáta Grešš Halász, PhD, is Lecturer, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia.
Background: The management of chronic leg ulcers, including venous leg ulcers (VLUs), causes a considerable economic and clinical burden to healthcare systems. Factors such as nursing time, hospital care, and wound dressings account for approximately 85% of the total cost. Superabsorbent dressings (eg, superabsorbent polymers [SAPs]) are recommended as a first-line treatment for moderately to highly exuding VLUs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Impact of Modifier-22 on Reimbursement Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation.
J Orthop Trauma
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Objectives: The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.
Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Transformation of the Algorithm for Prioritising Clinical Trial Development in Kazakhstan Based on Practical Significance.
Int J Health Plann Manage
January 2025
Salidat Kairbekova National Research Center for Health Development of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
The research relevance is determined by the need for rational use of limited resources in the healthcare sector and the importance of implementing the results of scientific research into medical practice to improve the quality of medical care. The study aims to identify key criteria and develop a system for evaluating clinical trials to prioritise the most promising areas based on their practical applicability in healthcare. The expert evaluation method of 17 research projects in the field of clinical medicine funded by government grants, involving 37 experts, was used to achieve the objective.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMediation in Healthcare: Enhancing Conflict Resolution Between Patients and Physicians Beyond the Courtroom.
Cureus
December 2024
Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, BGR.
Healthcare is defined by rapidly advancing technologies and increased patient expectations, resulting in frequent disagreements between patients, their families, and medical practitioners. Historically, these conflicts have been settled through the adversarial court system, which frequently fails to produce equitable results due to unequal legal representation, procedural difficulties, and other shortcomings. This analysis investigates mediation, a type of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), as a viable option for addressing healthcare disputes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!