Coverage of insulin delivery devices and basal insulin analogs by US managed care organizations.

J Med Econ

Clinical Development, Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Strategic Scientific Communications, Novo Nordisk Inc., Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

Published: March 2012

Objective: The perception in the US is that insulin formulations prescribed for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and delivered via insulin pens are more costly to patients than the same or similar products provided in vials, and that basal insulin analogs offered either in pens or vials are likewise more costly to patients than human insulin formulations. This study compares levels of coverage and copays by private and Medicare Part D plans for insulin pens and vials containing basal insulin analogs and for NPH formulations in vials.

Methods: A commercially available formulary database (Access Point, Pinsonault Associates; updated quarterly) was analyzed as of January 2010 for private insurance plans and as of March 2010 for Medicare Part D plans. Analyses were performed for Tier-level coverage and copays per prescription for basal insulin analogs in pens and vials, and NPH in vials.

Results: Basal insulin analogs in pens were covered by >91% of private and Part D plans. NPH coverage was reported by >92% of private plans and 69-95% of Part D plans, depending on brand. Irrespective of delivery mode, copays in the majority of private plans for basal insulin analogs and NPH were in the >$10-35 range. Copays were higher in Part D plans, with the majority of plans and subscribers in a >$35-50 range. Prior authorization was required by <10% of insurance plans for insulin analog pen prescriptions, and <3% of plans for insulin analog or NPH prescriptions in vials.

Limitations: This analysis was descriptive, copay stratification was not based on a statistical model but on copay ranges typically used by the plans, and there were no direct correlations performed on the numbers of subscribers per plan vs copay or Tier level.

Conclusion: These results counter the widely held perception that insurance coverage is less extensive for insulin pens vs vials. Medicare Part D plans often had higher copay requirements than private plans for the same product at the same copay Tier.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2011.613975DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

basal insulin
24
insulin analogs
24
pens vials
12
private plans
12
insulin
10
plans
9
insulin formulations
8
insulin pens
8
costly patients
8
vials basal
8

Similar Publications

A 58-year-old woman with a body mass index of 26.4 kg/m was referred because of high glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at a medical checkup. Her anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) titer was positive (16.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A woman in her 40s presented with severe post-bariatric hypoglycaemia that persisted despite nutritional therapy and pharmacological therapy with acarbose and subcutaneous octreotide with meals. The nutritional limitations were difficult to sustain, and she developed adverse effects to the pharmacological therapy, and hence, doses could not be increased. She was subsequently treated with subcutaneous octreotide via an insulin pump, with a continuous basal rate and additional bolus doses with meals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The advent of once-weekly insulin icodec is a promising development in the care of individuals with diabetes. These once-weekly formulations aimed to improve patient adherence and quality of life for patients who find daily injection administration challenging. Insulin icodec has demonstrated comparable glycemic control to conventionally used daily basal insulins, such as insulin glargine and degludec, in the ONWARDS clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The optimal application of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) in treating gestational diabetes remains uncertain. MNT involves individualised nutrition assessment and counselling, which is labour-intensive and is not the sole type of intervention offered by clinical dietitians.

Objective: To determine whether pregnancy outcomes differed for individuals with gestational diabetes who were offered MNT on a risk-prioritised (RP) versus universal basis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glucose-Lowering Agents Developed in the Last Two Decades and Their Perioperative Implications.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel)

December 2024

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

The last two decades have provided far more options f both patients and their physicians in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. While dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been approved for nearly two decades, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are relatively new. Of interest to perioperative physicians, these drugs present specific perioperative concerns, prompting many societies to issue guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!