AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: A combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of asthma. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of SAL/FP (50/250 μg) with fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 μg administrated twice daily for 2 weeks in treating patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind study in adult patients with symptomatic asthma that was not controlled by 1000 μg/d inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. 48 asthmatics were randomized to receive 2 inhalations of SAL/FP 50/250 μg bis in die (BID) or 2 inhalations of FP 250 μg BID, both delivered via Accuhaler device, for 2 weeks. The primary objective was the mean change from baseline in the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the two week period. Other parameters included lung function, daily asthma symptom scores, evening PEF, percentage of days free of rescue medication use and daily rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events spontaneously elicited at clinic visits.

Results: 46 patients provided evaluable efficacy for analysis. The morning PEF improved significantly throughout the two weeks of treatment compared with baseline in the SAL/FP group. Mean morning PEF was 23.0 L/min higher in SAL/FP group than in FP group (p = 0.013). The change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was greater in SAL/FP group compared to FP group (p = 0.048). There were similar effects on day-time and night-time symptom scores, percentage symptom free days and nights and usage of salbutamol. 70.8% of the patients receiving SAL/FP were satisfied with the treatment, while only 26.1% of patients receiving FP alone were (p = 0.020). No death or acute exacerbation occurred.

Conclusion: SAL/FP 50/250 μg was safe and effective, and had a high level of patient satisfaction resulting in significantly greater increases in morning PEF and FEV1 compared to the use of FP 250 μg alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluticasone propionate
12
sal/fp 50/250
12
50/250 μg
12
250 μg
12
morning pef
12
sal/fp group
12
efficacy tolerability
8
randomized double-blind
8
double-blind study
8
sal/fp
8

Similar Publications

/: Inhaler devices have been developed for the effective delivery of inhaled medications used in the treatment of pulmonary diseases. However, differing operating procedures across the devices can lead to user errors and reduce treatment efficacy, especially when patients use multiple devices simultaneously. To address this, we developed a novel dry powder inhaler (DPI), combining fluticasone propionate (FP), salmeterol xinafoate (SX), and tiotropium bromide (TB) into a single device designed for bioequivalent delivery compared to existing commercial products in an animal model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Single inhaler triple therapy is widely used in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma. This research aimed to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR) and Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI).

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Fluticasone propionate is a synthetic trifluoro-substituted glucocorticoid, a highly selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist. Fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspensions is an inhaled corticosteroid with the low systemic bioavailability which provides a low risk (benefit outcome without the adverse effects that accompany systemically administered corticosteroids), referred as a first-line preventive agent for patients with persistent asthma. China has become one of the countries with the highest asthma mortality rate in the world in the past years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fluticasone propionate nasal spray is widely regarded as a first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis. To establish bioequivalence between the test and reference products of fluticasone propionate nasal spray, an open-label, randomized, single-dose, and 2-sequence crossover study was conducted on 84 healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions to determine the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the 2 products. Following a single-dose administration (200 µg) of fluticasone propionate nasal spray, pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from administration to the last measurable concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from administration to infinity, exhibited similarity between the 2 products, with 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratios falling within the bioequivalence range of 80%-125%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Highly sensitive spectrofluorimetric methods were developed for the quantitative estimation of formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FFD) and fluticasone propionate (FP) in both authentic raw materials and marketed dosage forms using a micellar-enhanced spectrofluorimetric approach. The proposed methods are based on the determination of FP in the presence of FFD using the first derivative emission spectrofluorimetry. The peak amplitude of the emission spectra of the formed micellar fluorescence was measured at 465 nm after excitation at 236 nm (λ max of FP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!