Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) initiates the repair of a wide variety of (neutral or cationic) alkylated and deaminated purines by flipping damaged nucleotides out of the DNA helix and catalyzing the hydrolytic N-glycosidic bond cleavage. Unfortunately, the limited number of studies on the catalytic pathway has left many unanswered questions about the hydrolysis mechanism. Therefore, detailed ONIOM(M06-2X/6-31G(d):AMBER) reaction potential energy surface scans are used to gain the first atomistic perspective of the repair pathway used by AAG. The lowest barrier for neutral 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (εA) and cationic N(3)-methyladenine (3MeA) excision corresponds to a concerted (A(N)D(N)) mechanism, where our calculated ΔG(‡) = 87.3 kJ mol(-1) for εA cleavage is consistent with recent kinetic data. The use of a concerted mechanism supports previous speculations that AAG uses a nonspecific strategy to excise both neutral (εA) and cationic (3MeA) lesions. We find that AAG uses nonspecific active site DNA-protein π-π interactions to catalyze the removal of inherently more difficult to excise neutral lesions, and strongly bind to cationic lesions, which comes at the expense of raising the excision barrier for cationic substrates. Although proton transfer from the recently proposed general acid (protein-bound water) to neutral substrates does not occur, hydrogen-bond donation lowers the catalytic barrier, which clarifies the role of a general acid in the excision of neutral lesions. Finally, our work shows that the natural base adenine (A) is further inserted into the AAG active site than the damaged substrates, which results in the loss of a hydrogen bond with Y127 and misaligns the general base (E125) and water nucleophile to lead to poor nucleophile activation. Therefore, our work proposes how AAG discriminates against the natural purines in the chemical step and may also explain why some damaged pyrimidines are bound but are not excised by this enzyme.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja207181c | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!