Binding free energy landscape of domain-peptide interactions.

PLoS Comput Biol

Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Computational Biology and Biological Physics Group, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Published: August 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • Peptide recognition domains (PRDs) are key protein structures that facilitate numerous protein interactions, but the exact mechanisms behind their specific peptide recognition are not fully understood.
  • This study focuses on the binding characteristics of two types of PDZ domains (class I and II) using a Monte Carlo simulation, revealing that both domains have a strong preference for their native bound states and exhibit distinct binding behaviors.
  • The research shows that while both classes have energy barriers for binding, class I has a significantly weaker barrier compared to class II, leading to slower dynamics in binding for the latter, and it suggests that the C-terminal residue of peptides plays a critical role in the binding process.

Article Abstract

Peptide recognition domains (PRDs) are ubiquitous protein domains which mediate large numbers of protein interactions in the cell. How these PRDs are able to recognize peptide sequences in a rapid and specific manner is incompletely understood. We explore the peptide binding process of PDZ domains, a large PRD family, from an equilibrium perspective using an all-atom Monte Carlo (MC) approach. Our focus is two different PDZ domains representing two major PDZ classes, I and II. For both domains, a binding free energy surface with a strong bias toward the native bound state is found. Moreover, both domains exhibit a binding process in which the peptides are mostly either bound at the PDZ binding pocket or else interact little with the domain surface. Consistent with this, various binding observables show a temperature dependence well described by a simple two-state model. We also find important differences in the details between the two domains. While both domains exhibit well-defined binding free energy barriers, the class I barrier is significantly weaker than the one for class II. To probe this issue further, we apply our method to a PDZ domain with dual specificity for class I and II peptides, and find an analogous difference in their binding free energy barriers. Lastly, we perform a large number of fixed-temperature MC kinetics trajectories under binding conditions. These trajectories reveal significantly slower binding dynamics for the class II domain relative to class I. Our combined results are consistent with a binding mechanism in which the peptide C terminal residue binds in an initial, rate-limiting step.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3158039PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

binding free
16
free energy
16
binding
11
domains
8
binding process
8
pdz domains
8
domains exhibit
8
consistent binding
8
energy barriers
8
pdz
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!