Background: Advance directives and palliative crisis cards are means by which palliative care patients can exert their autonomy in end-of-life decisions.
Aim: To examine paramedics' attitudes towards advance directives and end-of-life care.
Design: Questionnaire-based investigation using a self-administered survey instrument.
Setting/participants: Paramedics of two cities (Hamburg and Goettingen, Germany) were included. Participants were questioned as to (1) their attitudes about advance directives, (2) their clinical experiences in connection with end-of-life situations (e.g. resuscitation), (3) their suggestions in regard to advance directives, 'Do not attempt resuscitation' orders and palliative crisis cards.
Results: Questionnaires were returned by 728 paramedics (response rate: 81%). The majority of paramedics (71%) had dealt with advance directives and end-of-life decisions in emergency situations. Most participants (84%) found that cardiopulmonary resuscitation in end-of-life patients is not useful and 75% stated that they would withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of legal possibility. Participants also mentioned that more extensive discussion of legal aspects concerning advance directives should be included in paramedic training curricula. They suggested that palliative crisis cards should be integrated into end-of-life care.
Conclusions: Decision making in prehospital end-of-life care is a challenge for all paramedics. The present investigation demonstrates that a dialogue bridging emergency medical and palliative care issues is necessary. The paramedics indicated that improved guidelines on end-of-life decisions and the termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in palliative care patients may be essential. Participants do not feel adequately trained in end-of-life care and the content of advance directives. Other recent studies have also demonstrated that there is a need for training curricula in end-of-life care for paramedics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216311419885 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med Ethics
December 2024
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Medical Statistics, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Background: There is wide convergence in the positions of scientific societies, patient associations and public bodies regarding the advisability of advance care planning (ACP) in cognitive disorders and dementia to respect the specificity of the person. Nevertheless, planning in advance for dementia represents a unique challenge. In Italy, law n.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
December 2024
Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Despite the benefits of Advance directives, approximately only 1 in 3 U.S adults have documented advance directives. In medical school and residency, learners are often not taught or given very brief information on conducting end-of-life planning conversations with patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hosp Palliat Care
December 2024
Department of Family Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si and Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care is essential for patient autonomy and quality of dying. This review explores ACP practices in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, highlighting how legislation and cultural values shape those practices. In these three sectors, which are influenced by Confucian values, family involvement plays a significant role in decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Law Med Ethics
December 2024
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA.
As increasing proportions of our global population age, transgender people are experiencing higher rates of dementia, and many are afraid to enter long-term care. Structural interventions such as advance directives may help mitigate fears around entering long-term care by managing specific anxieties that transgender people may have about dementia, loss of decision-making capacity, and discrimination in long-term care settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioethics
December 2024
Departments of Philosophy and Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
As the prevalence of dementia rises, it is increasingly important to determine how to best respect incapable individuals' autonomy during end-of-life decisions. Many philosophers advocate for the use of advance directives in these situations to allow capable individuals to outline preferences for their future incapable selves. In this paper, however, I consider whether advance directives lack moral authority in instances of dementia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!