AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine patient preferences regarding the duration of trial period.

Materials And Methods: Forty patients were given a trial of spinal cord stimulation. They were questioned daily if they would like to proceed to a permanent implant. Three consecutive affirmative answers implied a successful trial; three negative replies implied a failed trial. Patients rated daily the pain from the surgery, original pain, satisfaction with the stimulator, and the duration of the use of the stimulator.

Results: The trial duration varied from 3 to 15 days. Patients with a failed trial took longer to make a decision and also experienced prolonged surgical pain. The majority of patients with a successful trial experienced more than 50% pain reduction. The rate of infection was 7.5%, which has reduced to 2.8% after changing the dressing protocol.

Conclusions: In this study, all patients could make a decision in 15 days, with successful trials requiring a shorter duration. The conversion rate was similar to rates in literature despite patients making a decision without physician input.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00384.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trial
8
spinal cord
8
cord stimulation
8
successful trial
8
failed trial
8
patients
6
pain
5
prospective analysis
4
analysis trial
4
trial period
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!