Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Native French speakers (N = 24; M age = 20.1 yr.) were orally presented with sentences they were asked to write on a digitizing tablet, either with full visual feedback or with no visual feedback. The study assessed the extent to which the visual feedback contributed to supervising of verbal agreement processes, either postgraphically (detecting and revising any error that has been produced) or pregraphically (checking the graphemic plan before it is transcribed). The proportion of erroneous agreements was smaller with visual feedback (7%) than without (14%). The proportion of erroneous agreements that were spontaneously corrected was much higher with visual feedback (34%) than without (0%). There were significantly more pauses right before or within the transcription of the verbal inflection with visual feedback (8%) than without (3%).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/11.24.28.PMS.112.3.680-690 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!