AI Article Synopsis

  • An online Script Concordance Test (ENT-SCT) was developed and administered to assess clinical reasoning in ear, nose, and throat medicine among different experience levels.
  • The study involved 132 participants, including medical students, ENT residents, and expert otorhinolaryngologists, with findings indicating significant score differences based on experience level and a high reliability coefficient (Cronbach α = 0.95).
  • Most participants regarded the test as realistic and relevant, finding it enjoyable and intuitive, suggesting its potential use in residency programs and ongoing medical education.

Article Abstract

Objective: To report on the creation and administration of an online Script Concordance Test (SCT) for ear, nose, and throat (ENT), the ENT-SCT.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Two tertiary care university centers.

Participants: In total, 132 individuals were asked to test an ENT-SCT of 20 cases and 94 questions based on the major educational objectives of the ENT residency program.

Main Outcome Measures: Three levels of experience were tested: medical students, ENT residents, and board-certified otorhinolaryngologists as the expert panel. The test's construct validity-whether scores were related to clinical experience-was statistically analyzed. Reliability was estimated by the Cronbach α internal consistency coefficient. Participants' perception of the test was assessed with the use of a questionnaire.

Results: The 65 respondents with usable data were medical students (n = 21), ENT residents (n = 22), and experts (n = 22). Total mean (SD) test scores differed significantly: 76.81 (3.31) for the expert panel, 69.05 (4.35) for residents, and 58.29 (5.86) for students. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.95. More than two-thirds of the participants found the test to be realistic and relevant for assessing clinical reasoning. The test was also considered fun, interesting, and intuitive.

Conclusions: The Web-based ENT-SCT is feasible, reliable, and useful for assessing clinical reasoning. This online assessment tool may have applications for residency programs and continuing medical education.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.106DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical reasoning
12
online script
8
script concordance
8
concordance test
8
medical students
8
ent residents
8
expert panel
8
assessing clinical
8
test
7
clinical
5

Similar Publications

Background: Lung cancer has high morbidity and mortality rates, which results in a poor prognosis. Cuproptosis is a novel cell death mechanism. The aim of this study was to examine the biological characteristics and clinical significance of genes associated with cuproptosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of LUAD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Global aphasia is a severe communication disorder affecting all language modalities, commonly caused by stroke. Evidence as to whether the functional communication of people with global aphasia (PwGA) can improve after speech and language therapy (SLT) is limited and conflicting. This is partly because cognition, which is relevant to participation in therapy and implicated in successful functional communication, can be severely impaired in global aphasia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: Despite significant investments in the normalization and the standardization of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), free text is still the rule rather than the exception in clinical notes. The use of free text has implications in data reuse methods used for supporting clinical research since the query mechanisms used in cohort definition and patient matching are mainly based on structured data and clinical terminologies. This study aims to develop a method for the secondary use of clinical text by: (a) using Natural Language Processing (NLP) for tagging clinical notes with biomedical terminology; and (b) designing an ontology that maps and classifies all the identified tags to various terminologies and allows for running phenotyping queries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cognitive biases in osteopathic diagnosis: a mixed study among French osteopaths.

Diagnosis (Berl)

January 2025

Scientific and Osteopathic Research Department, Institut de Formation en Ostéopathie du Grand Avignon IFO-GA, Avignon, France.

Objectives: Although cognitive biases are one of the most frequent causes of diagnostic errors, their influence remains underestimated in allied health professions, especially in osteopathy. Yet, a part of osteopathic clinical reasoning and diagnosis rely on the practitioner's intuition and subjective haptic perceptions. The aim of this study is to highlight links between the cognitive biases perceived by the practitioner to understand cognitive patterns during osteopathic diagnosis, and to suggest debiasing strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical reasoning is a professional capability required for clinical practice. In preclinical training, clinical reasoning is often taught implicitly, and feedback is focused on discrete outcomes of decision-making. This makes it challenging to provide meaningful feedback on the often-hidden metacognitive process of reasoning to address specific clinical reasoning difficulties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!