A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effort-Shape and kinematic assessment of bodily expression of emotion during gait. | LitMetric

Effort-Shape and kinematic assessment of bodily expression of emotion during gait.

Hum Mov Sci

Department of Movement Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2214, USA.

Published: February 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore how different emotions (joy, anger, sadness, contentment, and neutral) affect walking patterns in 16 individuals using motion capture technology.
  • Observers were able to identify the emotions displayed in walking videos, with contentment being more accurately interpreted from the front view compared to the side view.
  • The findings revealed that walking speed was fastest during joy and anger and slowest during sadness, while emotional effects on body posture and limb movements were more prominently captured through Effort-Shape analysis than through kinematic measurements.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the movement characteristics associated with positive and negative emotions experienced during walking. Joy, contentment, anger, sadness, and neutral were elicited in 16 individuals, and motion capture data were collected as they walked while experiencing the emotions. Observers decoded the target emotions from side and front view videos of the walking trials; other observers viewed the same videos to rate the qualitative movement features using an Effort-Shape analysis. Kinematic analysis was used to quantify body posture and limb movements during walking with the different emotions. View did not affect decoding accuracy except for contentment, which was slightly enhanced with the front view. Walking speed was fastest for joy and anger, and slowest for sadness. Although walking speed may have accounted for increased amplitude of hip, shoulder, elbow, pelvis and trunk motion for anger and joy compared to sadness, neck and thoracic flexion with sadness, and trunk extension and shoulder depression with joy were independent of gait speed. More differences among emotions occurred with the Effort-Shape rather than the kinematic analysis, suggesting that observer judgments of Effort-Shape characteristics were more sensitive than the kinematic outcomes to differences among emotions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.05.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

effort-shape kinematic
8
front view
8
kinematic analysis
8
walking speed
8
differences emotions
8
emotions
6
walking
5
effort-shape
4
kinematic assessment
4
assessment bodily
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!