Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To establish the method for determination of ephedrine hydrochloride, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and methylephedrine hydrochloride in maxingshigan decoction by capillary electrophoresis.
Methods: The separation was performed on a fused silica capillary of 60 cm x 55 microcrpm ID (52 cm of effective length). 60 mmol/L NaB4O7 + 10% (V/V) CH3OH (pH 9.0) was selected as the running buffer. The separation voltage was 12 kV. The samples was injected by gravity (10 s, 15 cm). The detection wavelength was 210 nm and berberine hydrochloride was the internal standard.
Results: The linear range of determination for ephedrine hydrochloride, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and methylephedrine hydrochloride were 20.0-160.0 microg/mL (r = 0.9999), 7.5-60.0 microg/mL (r = 0.9991) and 2.0-10.0 microg/mL (r = 0.9993). The average recoveries were 98.0%, 97.0% and 97.8%, the precisions of the method were 2.31%, 2.21% and 2.00% (n=6), respectively.
Conclusion: The method is convenient, rapid and accurate for the quality control of maxingshigan decoction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!