Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Apart from pulmonary vein isolation, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) lacks reliable electrophysiological endpoints. The present study investigated the prognostic value of changes in AF inducibility due to ablation.
Methods: Between 10/2006 and 10/2009 121 patients referred for catheter ablation of symptomatic, drug refractory paroxysmal AF were included. Sinus rhythm immediately before ablation was a prerequisite for study entry. Two respective attempts to induce AF (>1min) by decremental coronary sinus stimulation before and after ablation were performed.
Results: A total of 121 patients aged 59.5±10.4years undergoing pulmonary vein isolation due to paroxysmal AF were included. The median follow-up duration was 12.1months [quartiles: 6.5-20.3months]. In 36 (30%) patients AF was inducible before, but not after ablation. Forty-nine (41%) patients were neither inducible before nor after the procedure, whereas 25 patients (21%) displayed unchanged inducibility. In 11 patients (9%) AF was inducible only after ablation. Patients with inducibility solely after the ablation had the highest risk of AF recurrence (HR 6.71 [95%-CI 2.76-16.30], p=0.0005) compared to patients without inducibility before and after the procedure.
Conclusion: The results of attempted AF induction before and after ablation have significance with respect to ablation outcome. Both patient groups with either unchanged inducibility or facilitated induction after ablation had the highest recurrence rates of AF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.07.023 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!