Background: Feeding device replacement is often required for long-term maintenance after initial percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy placement. Although there are several case reports on serious complications of gastrostomy device replacement, there are few reports of an overall analysis of the complications associated with feeding device replacement.
Objective: To evaluate the frequency and variety of complications of transcutaneous replacement of feeding devices.
Design: A retrospective study.
Setting: Single center: Nishimino Kosei Hospital.
Patients: This study involved 363 consecutive patients undergoing a total of 1265 percutaneous gastrostomy or jejunostomy device replacements from March 2000 to September 2010.
Intervention: A new replacement device was inserted through the ostomy tract by using an obturator after traction removal of the previous device. Endoscopic treatments were performed in the cases of fistula disruption or hemorrhage.
Main Outcome Measurements: Complications and their outcomes.
Results: Gastrostomy and jejunostomy devices were replaced 1126 and 139 times, respectively. There were 16 complications (1.3% of total replacements) consisting of 10 cases of fistula disruption caused by misplacement of replacement devices into the peritoneal cavity, 4 cases of hemorrhage, and 1 case each of colocutaneous fistula and device breakage. Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were continued in all 4 hemorrhage cases but in only 27 of 347 (7.7%) complication-free cases (P < .0001). There were no replacement-related adverse events that required surgical repair.
Limitations: A single center, retrospective analysis.
Conclusion: Fistula disruption and hemorrhage were the most common complications associated with device replacement. In patients on anticoagulants, caution is necessary to avoid hemorrhage after replacement. It is also important to verify that the replaced device is located in the GI tract lumen before feeding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.032 | DOI Listing |
Pediatr Surg Int
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gastroenterology
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Description: The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update is to facilitate understanding and improve the clinical practice of endoscopic enteral access.
Methods: This expert commentary was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology.
VideoGIE
November 2024
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol
November 2024
Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Wellstar Medical College of Georgia Health, Augusta, Georgia.
Curr Oncol
October 2024
Precancerous Lesions and Early Cancer Management Group IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Rua Doutor António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Several techniques exist to maintain oral and/or enteral feeding among esophageal cancer (EC) patients, but their impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of nutritional support techniques on PROs in EC patients. We searched Medline, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete from inception to 3 April 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!