Associations between five polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor (i.e., VEGF +936C/T, -1154A/G, -2578C/A, -634G/C and -460T/C) and risk of breast cancer have been extensively studied, and the currently available results are inconclusive. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to further study the associations. The databases of Pubmed, Embase and CNKI were retrieved up to April 1st, 2010. The pooled ORs and 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of the associations. A total of 10 case-control studies with 8175 cases and 8528 controls were included in this study. The overall results of combined analyses showed that five polymorphisms of VEGF were not associated with risk of breast cancer [ORs (95% CIs): 1.03 (0.84-1.27) for CC vs. TT for +936C/T, 0.95 (0.81-1.12) for AA vs. GG for -1154A/G, 1.01 (0.90-1.14) for CC vs. AA for -2578C/A, 1.02 (0.90-1.16) for GG vs. CC for -634G/C and 0.86 (0.68-1.09) for TT vs. CC for -460T/C]. When subgroup analyses by ethnicity for VEGF +936C/T and -634G/C, the results suggested that +936C/T was not associated with the risk of breast cancer for either Asians [1.40 (0.92-2.13) for CC vs. TT and CC+CT vs. TT: 1.38 (0.91-2.10) for CC+CT vs. TT] or Caucasians [0.93 (0.73-1.19) for CC vs. TT and 0.91 (0.72-1.16) for CC+CT vs. TT], and -634G/C was not associated with the breast cancer for Caucasians [1.07 (0.92-1.24) for GG vs. CC and 1.05 (0.91-1.21) for GG+GC vs. CC]. In addition, when excluding one study, which was out of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for VEGF +963C/T and whose controls were from both patients and healthy people, the negative results were also persistent, and ORs (95% CIs) were 1.04 (0.84-1.29) for CC vs. TT, 1.03 (0.83-1.27) for (CC+CT) vs. TT. This meta-analysis suggests that the VEGF +936C/T, -1154A/G, -2578C/A, -634G/C and -460T/C may be not associated with risk of breast cancer development based on the currently available studies, especially for Caucasians. More well designed studies with larger sample size on different ethnicities are needed to further assess the associations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2011.06.018 | DOI Listing |
Jpn J Clin Oncol
January 2025
Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Miyagi Cancer Center Research Institute, 47-1 Nodayama, Medeshima-Shiode, Natori, Miyagi 981-1293, Japan.
A Japanese woman with Li-Fraumeni syndrome in her 40s underwent comprehensive genetic profiling accompanied by germline data using the Oncoguide NCC Oncopanel, but no germline pathogenic variants in the tumor suppressor gene TP53 were detected. However, careful examination of additional data in the report suggested the presence of a large TP53 deletion. Custom targeting next-generation sequencing and nanopore sequencing revealed a 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 2025
Providence Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Purpose: Standard therapy for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery is radiation therapy (RT) plus hormone therapy (HT). For patients with a low-risk of recurrence, there is an interest in deescalating therapy.
Methods And Materials: A retrospective study was carried out for patients treated at the Swedish Cancer Institute from 2000 to 2015, aged 70 years or older, with pT1N0 or pT1NX estrogen receptor-positive and ERBB2-negative unifocal breast cancer without positive surgical margins, high nuclear grade, or lymphovascular invasion.
Acta Oncol
January 2025
Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Cancer Survivorship, The Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Introduction: To target psychological support to cancer patients most in need of support, screening for psychological distress has been advocated and, in some settings, also implemented. Still, no prior studies have examined the appropriate 'dosage' and whether screening for distress before cancer treatment may be sufficient or if further screenings during treatment are necessary. We examined the development in symptom trajectories for breast cancer patients with low distress before surgery and explored potential risk factors for developing burdensome symptoms at a later point in time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Mol Biol Lett
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Arcavacata Di Rende, 87036, Cosenza, Italy.
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Highly targeted therapies have been developed for different subtypes of breast cancer, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metastatic breast cancer disease are primarily treated with chemotherapy, which improves disease-free and overall survival, but does not offer a curative solution for these aggressive forms of breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department of Genetics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nowadays, chemotherapy and immunotherapy remain the major treatment strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Identifying biomarkers to pre-select and subclassify TNBC patients with distinct chemotherapy responses is essential. In the current study, we performed an unbiased Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) on TNBC cells treated with chemotherapy compounds and found a leading significant increase of phosphor-AURKA/B/C, AURKA, AURKB, and PLK1, which fall into the mitotic kinase group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!