Background: The lamprey spinal cord is a well-characterized vertebrate network that could facilitate our understanding of anesthetic action. We tested several hypotheses concerning the lamprey's clinical application to anesthesia, and the sites/mechanisms of anesthetic action.
Methods: In isolated lamprey spinal cords, minimum immobilizing concentrations (MICs) were determined for halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, propofol, or the nonimmobilizer F6 (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane), applied during D-glutamate-induced fictive swimming or noxious tail stimulation. Isoflurane and propofol effects on fictive swimming were tested in the presence and absence of strychnine and/or picrotoxin.
Results: Volatile anesthetic MICs were clinically comparable. Isoflurane MIC for fictive swimming and noxious stimulus-evoked movement were the same. F6 did not produce immobility, but decreased the amplitude and phase lag of fictive swimming. Isoflurane decreased fictive swimming cycle frequency, amplitude, autocorrelation, rostrocaudal phase lag, and coherence. Strychnine and picrotoxin elicited only disorganized motor activity under isoflurane and caused small increases in MIC. The effects of propofol differed from isoflurane for all locomotor rhythm variables except amplitude. The propofol MIC was much larger in lampreys compared with mammals. However, picrotoxin reversed propofol-induced immobility by reinitiating coordinated locomotor activity and increasing MIC>8-fold.
Conclusions: The lamprey spinal cord is a relevant and tractable vertebrate network model for anesthetic action. Isoflurane disrupts interneuronal locomotor networks. γ-Aminobutyric acid A and glycine receptors have marginal roles in isoflurane-induced immobility in lampreys. Propofol's selective γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor-mediated immobilizing mechanism is conserved in lampreys. The differential immobilizing mechanisms of isoflurane versus propofol reflect those in mammals, and further suggest different network modes of immobilizing action.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200493 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182273c34 | DOI Listing |
Curr Opin Neurobiol
October 2023
Institut des Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, CNRS Unité Mixte de Recherche 5287, Université de Bordeaux, 33706 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address:
Neural replicas of the spinal motor commands that drive locomotion have become increasingly recognized as an intrinsic neural mechanism for producing gaze-stabilizing eye movements that counteract the perturbing effects of self-generated head/body motion. By pre-empting reactive signaling by motion-detecting vestibular sensors, such locomotor efference copies (ECs) provide estimates of the sensory consequences of behavioral action. Initially demonstrated in amphibian larvae during spontaneous fictive swimming in deafferented in vitro preparations, direct evidence for a contribution of locomotor ECs to gaze stabilization now extends to the ancestral lamprey and to tetrapod adult frogs and mice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Biol
August 2023
Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address:
J Neurosci
May 2023
Department of Neurobiology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Navigation requires steering and propulsion, but how spinal circuits contribute to direction control during ongoing locomotion is not well understood. Here, we use drifting vertical gratings to evoke directed "fictive" swimming in intact but immobilized larval zebrafish while performing electrophysiological recordings from spinal neurons. We find that directed swimming involves unilateral changes in the duration of motor output and increased recruitment of motor neurons, without impacting the timing of spiking across or along the body.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
May 2023
Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Similar design characterizes neuronal networks for goal-directed motor control across the complex, segmented vertebrates, insects, and polychaete annelids with jointed appendages. Evidence is lacking for whether this design evolved independently in those lineages, evolved in parallel with segmentation and appendages, or could have been present in a soft-bodied common ancestor. We examined coordination of locomotion in an unsegmented, ciliolocomoting gastropod, the sea slug , which may better resemble the urbilaterian ancestor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
February 2023
School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, United Kingdom
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!