Laparoscopic revision of failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review.

Am J Surg

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, South Wharf Rd., London, W2 1NY UK.

Published: September 2011

Background: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an accepted treatment for persistent gastroesophageal reflux but about 4% of patients will eventually require revision surgery.

Methods: We searched The Cochrane Collaboration, Medline, and EMBASE databases, augmented by Google Scholar and PubMed related articles from January 1, 1990, to November 22, 2010. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 930 surgeries.

Results: The mean surgical duration was 166 minutes and conversion to open revision fundoplication was required in 7% of cases. Complications were reported in 14% of cases and the mean length of stay varied between 1.2 and 6 days. A good to excellent result was reported for 84% of surgeries and 5% of patients required a further revisional procedure.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic revision antireflux surgery appears to be feasible and safe, but subject to somewhat greater risk of conversion, higher morbidity, longer hospital stay, and poorer outcomes than primary laparoscopic fundoplication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antireflux surgery
12
laparoscopic revision
8
laparoscopic
4
revision failed
4
failed antireflux
4
surgery systematic
4
systematic review
4
review background
4
background laparoscopic
4
laparoscopic antireflux
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!