Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Case-based discussion (CbD) is a workplace-based assessment which is used formatively to help develop a GP trainee's performance and which will also contribute to the judgement made on a trainee's competence at the end of their training. The views of GP trainers and trainee's in their final year of training were explored quantitively to identify if CbD was of value, its limitations and whether or not it could assess a trainee's performance. The results suggest as an isolated assessment it is not possible to fully assess performance. The feedback received by the trainee did encourage the learner to develop and an improvement in performance in subsequent assessments could be demonstrated. This, however, relied on the skills and confidence of the educator in giving feedback. Further work on the development of feedback skills need to be introduced for the benefits of this assessment to be maximised.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2011.11494004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!