Successful vapor-based endometrial ablation: in vivo peri-hysterectomy study.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Department of Gynecology, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Facultad de Medicina, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.

Published: December 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the AEGEA vapor-based endometrial ablation system in a feasibility setting using nine women undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding.
  • The intervention involved a 90-second vapor treatment, with post-treatment analysis showing no significant injuries to the surrounding tissues and high percentages of treated endometrial surfaces.
  • Results indicated effective endometrial ablation with minimal thermal damage to adjacent structures, suggesting the system's potential for safe and thorough treatment.

Article Abstract

Study Objective: To evaluate the AEGEA vapor-based endometrial ablation system using an in vivo peri-hysterectomy model.

Design: Single-site feasibility study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting: University medical center.

Patients: Nine women consented to undergo AEGEA endometrial ablation before previously scheduled abdominal hysterectomy to treat abnormal uterine bleeding.

Interventions: In vivo AEGEA endometrial ablation was performed using a 90-second vapor treatment cycle. After hysterectomy, the uteri were examined for the extent and location of endomyometrial ablation (macroscopic triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining) and fallopian tube injury (microscopic nitroblue tetrazolium staining).

Measurements And Main Results: The mean (SD) posttreatment measurements of the 9 uteri were as follows: weight, 143 (40) g; length, 10.3 (1.3 cm); thickness, 4.4 (0.6) cm; and width, 6.2 (0.7) cm. The endometrial thickness was 1.1 (0.7) mm. Three uteri had myomas that measured less than 2 cm; and 2 uteri demonstrated focal adenomyosis. No myometrial perforation or thermal serosal injury was identified. The median corpus, lower uterine cavity and bilateral cornua percentages of TTC-negative surface endometrial treatment were 100% (range: 100-100%), 100% (range: 80-100%), and 100% (range: 95-100%), respectively. The closest distance between the ablation and serosa was 11.5 (3.2) mm. No lower endocervical or exocervical thermal injury was identified. Minimal fallopian tube thermal injury was identified in 18% of interstitial segments evaluated, and measured 0.6 to 0.8 mm in maximal depth and extended to within 6.3 to 9.5 mm of the serosa. No thermal injury was identified in the extrauterine fallopian tube segments.

Conclusion: The AEGEA vapor-based endometrial ablation system has the potential to provide excellent cavity coverage with full-thickness endometrial ablation. The study results further support an acceptable in vivo safety profile for future clinical efficacy trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.03.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endometrial ablation
24
injury identified
16
vapor-based endometrial
12
fallopian tube
12
100% range
12
thermal injury
12
endometrial
8
ablation
8
aegea vapor-based
8
ablation system
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!