Objective: A negative relationship between coronary stenting before coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and the perioperative mortality and morbidity has been shown in diabetic patients. We tried to assess this relationship in a 2-institution database.

Methods: In the years 2005 and 2006, 1125 of 3311 patients undergoing CABG surgery had diabetes mellitus (33.9%), and 185 (16.4%) of the diabetic patients had at least 1 previous stent. There was no evidence of any clinically significant difference in the preoperative and intraoperative parameters between diabetics with or without previous stents.

Results: Thirty-day mortality (no-stent group, 3.86%; stent group, 1.62%) and postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure) (no-stent group, 12.2%; stent group, 5.9%) occurred more often in diabetic patients without coronary stents. Logistic regression for 30-day mortality using possible confounders including preoperative stent showed a significant positive effect of preoperative coronary stenting (OR, 0.157; 95% CI limits, 0.033-0.737). Taking percutaneous coronary intervention out of the calculation model, this positive effect was no longer significant (OR, 0.344; CI, 0.091-1.298). Logistic regression for perioperative MACCE, with as well as without percutaneous coronary intervention as a confounder, also showed a significant positive effect of preoperative coronary stenting (OR, 0.231; 95% CI, 0.091-0.590).

Conclusions: Coronary stenting before CAGB in diabetic patients does not predispose to a higher perioperative risk regarding mortality and morbidity after CABG surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary stenting
20
diabetic patients
20
cabg surgery
12
coronary
10
stenting coronary
8
coronary artery
8
artery bypass
8
bypass graft
8
perioperative risk
8
mortality morbidity
8

Similar Publications

Intracardiac migration of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter or stent is a rare but potentially fatal complication of endovascular venous device placement. There is no consensus whether migrated stents should be surgically removed by open cardiac surgery or retrieved by the percutaneous endovascular route and whether an intervention should be performed immediately or expectantly. Herein, we report a 39-year-old female who received emergent left lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) owing to posthepatectomy liver failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the prognosis and influencing factors of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to late stent thrombosis (LST) and very late stent thrombosis (VLST).

Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI caused by LST and VLST at Tianjin Chest Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021 were selected as the study subjects, and long-term follow-up was conducted. The baseline clinical features, laboratory examination indicators, echocardiography results, coronary angiography and intervention treatment characteristics, and antiplatelet treatment status of patients were collected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hybrid procedure of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, comprising ductus arteriosus stenting and bilateral pulmonary artery banding, is a good surgical option for initial palliative procedure for high-risk patients for Norwood procedure. However, ductal stenting may cause retrograde aortic blood flow obstruction. Furthermore, complete removal of stent while performing the Norwood procedure make the operation more difficult.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 16-year-old male with newly diagnosed granulomatosis with polyangiitis presented to the emergency room with chest pain. He was found to have a myocardial infarction involving the right coronary artery and the left circumflex artery. He underwent mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement without significant sequelae.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Supera interwoven nitinol stents (IWNS) and Eluvia fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) were designed to improve the patency of the femoropopliteal (FP) artery; however, which type of stent yields superior outcomes in calcified FP lesions remains unclear.

Aims: To compare the safety and efficacy of Supera IWNS and Eluvia DES in severely calcified FP lesions.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 257 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular therapy using either IWNS (n = 123) or DES (n = 134) for FP lesions with peripheral arterial calcium scoring system (PACSS) grade 3 or 4 severe calcification between April 2018 and December 2021 at eight cardiovascular centers in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!