Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size.

PLoS One

Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • Grouping behavior in animals helps reduce predation risk by making it harder for predators to target individuals, particularly those that stand out ("oddity effect") based on their appearance.
  • A study using Trinidadian guppies showed that larger fish prefer to group with similar-sized mates, while smaller fish showed more flexibility in their choices, often moving between groups, especially when predation risk was higher.
  • The findings suggest that both body size and predation risk influence shoaling decisions, with larger fish being more affected by "oddity," while also highlighting the importance of learned decision-making as fish grow older.

Article Abstract

Background: Grouping behaviour, common across the animal kingdom, is known to reduce an individual's risk of predation; particularly through dilution of individual risk and predator confusion (predator inability to single out an individual for attack). Theory predicts greater risk of predation to individuals more conspicuous to predators by difference in appearance from the group (the 'oddity' effect). Thus, animals should choose group mates close in appearance to themselves (eg. similar size), whilst also choosing a large group.

Methodology And Principal Findings: We used the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a well known model species of group-living freshwater fish, in a series of binary choice trials investigating the outcome of conflict between preferences for large and phenotypically matched groups along a predation risk gradient. We found body-size dependent differences in the resultant social decisions. Large fish preferred shoaling with size-matched individuals, while small fish demonstrated no preference. There was a trend towards reduced preferences for the matched shoal under increased predation risk. Small fish were more active than large fish, moving between shoals more frequently. Activity levels increased as predation risk decreased. We found no effect of unmatched shoal size on preferences or activity.

Conclusions And Significance: Our results suggest that predation risk and individual body size act together to influence shoaling decisions. Oddity was more important for large than small fish, reducing in importance at higher predation risks. Dilution was potentially of limited importance at these shoal sizes. Activity levels may relate to how much sampling of each shoal was needed by the test fish during decision making. Predation pressure may select for better decision makers to survive to larger size, or that older, larger fish have learned to make shoaling decisions more efficiently, and this, combined with their size relative to shoal-mates, and attractiveness as prey items influences shoaling decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130026PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014819PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

predation risk
16
small fish
12
shoaling decisions
12
body size
8
predation
8
risk predation
8
fish
8
large fish
8
increased predation
8
activity levels
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!