A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Measured Creatinine Clearance and Clearances Estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD Formulas in Patients with a Single Kidney. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the accuracy of the Cockroft-Gault (Cl(CG)) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (GFR(MDRD)) formulas in estimating kidney function against the traditional 24-hour urine collection method (ClCr(m)) in patients who have undergone nephrectomy.
  • Results showed that ClCr(m) values were significantly higher than both Cl(CG) and GFR(MDRD), with Cl(CG) correlating better with ClCr(m) than GFR(MDRD).
  • The findings suggest that Cl(CG) is a more reliable formula for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with one kidney, highlighting its relevance over GFR(MDRD) in this specific population.

Article Abstract

There are doubts about whether the values obtained from the Cockroft-Gault (Cl(CG)) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (GFR(MDRD)) formulas are comparable to the more traditional formula used to obtain the creatinine clearance from a 24-hour urine collection (ClCr(m)), particularly in patients with only one kidney. The present study aimed to compare these formulas in individuals with one remaining kidney after previous nephrectomy (Nx) and to verify which estimated formula correlates more closely with ClCr(m). Thirty-six patients who had undergone Nx had their renal filtration analyzed with Cl(CG), GFR(MDRD) and by ClCr(m). The average time after Nx was 11.6 ± 9.0 years, and the average age at the time of the study was 50.7 ± 10.6 years old (X ± SD). The results of three clearances were 81.1 ± 35.6 mL·min·m(2) for ClCr(m), 70.4 ± 24.0 mL·min·m(2) for ClCr(CG), and 71.2 ± 19.2 mL·min·m(2) for GFR(MDRD) (with ClCr(m) > ClCr(CG) and GFR(MDRD); P < .001). No difference was found between the ClCr(CG) and GFR(MDRD) values (P = .72). The data demonstrated that both estimate formulas were strongly correlated with ClCr(m), although ClCr(CG) was more closely associated with ClCr(m) than GFR(MDRD) (ClCr(CG) with r(2) : 0.64 and GFR(MDRD) with r(2) : 0.34; P < .001). In conclusion, for people with only one kidney remaining after NX, our data showed that glomerular filtration rate estimation by ClCr(CG) is more related to the values obtained with the traditional clearance measurement based on a 24-hour urine collection test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124884PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/626178DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

creatinine clearance
8
24-hour urine
8
urine collection
8
gfrmdrd clcrm
8
clcrm clcrcg
8
clcrcg gfrmdrd
8
gfrmdrd
7
clcrm
7
clcrcg
6
comparison measured
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!