A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Selection of an immunoassay screening cutoff concentration for opioids in oral fluid. | LitMetric

Selection of an immunoassay screening cutoff concentration for opioids in oral fluid.

J Anal Toxicol

Immunalysis Corporation, Pomona, California 91767, USA.

Published: July 2011

A retrospective analysis of data from oral fluid specimens was conducted in order to identify a relevant cutoff concentration for opiates and/or synthetic opiates in oral fluid. Previously proposed regulations from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) have recommended 40 μg/L as a cutoff concentration. In this study, data from oral fluid specimens collected using the Quantisal™ device and screened with enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for both opiates and oxycodone were retrospectively assessed for screen positives > 20 μg/L and those between negative and 20 μg/L. Specimens identified at these concentrations were then analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectral detection using a fully validated procedure. Overall, 156 positive specimens were identified using 40 μg/L; 191 specimens using 20 μg/L; and 241 specimens between negative and 20 μg/L. Specifically, the number of 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM) positives increased from 10 to 16; morphine 4 to 9; codeine from 11 to 19; oxycodone from 56 to 74; hydrocodone from 73 to 119; and hydromorphone from 2 to 4 when specimens with enzyme inhibition between negative and 20 μg/L were analyzed. For workplace testing where only codeine, morphine, and 6-AM are considered, the use of a lowered cutoff concentration produced significant increases in the positive rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/anatox/35.6.369DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cutoff concentration
16
oral fluid
16
negative μg/l
12
data oral
8
fluid specimens
8
specimens identified
8
specimens
7
μg/l
7
selection immunoassay
4
immunoassay screening
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!