Voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography.

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: Network is unreachable

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography. | LitMetric

Pediatr Nephrol

Published: October 2011

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-1849-2	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

voiding urosonography

urosonography second-generation

second-generation contrast

contrast agent

agent versus

versus voiding

voiding cystourethrography

voiding

second-generation

contrast

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!