Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions.

PLoS One

School of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Published: December 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • 21st-century scientific research relies heavily on data sharing, which is essential for verifying results and building on previous findings.
  • Scientists face challenges sharing data due to time constraints and lack of funding, leading to satisfaction with short-term data management but dissatisfaction with long-term preservation.
  • Addressing these barriers, influenced by researchers' cultures and practices, is crucial; new funding agency mandates and initiatives like NSF-sponsored DataNET could facilitate improvements in data sharing and management.

Article Abstract

Background: Scientific research in the 21st century is more data intensive and collaborative than in the past. It is important to study the data practices of researchers--data accessibility, discovery, re-use, preservation and, particularly, data sharing. Data sharing is a valuable part of the scientific method allowing for verification of results and extending research from prior results.

Methodology/principal Findings: A total of 1329 scientists participated in this survey exploring current data sharing practices and perceptions of the barriers and enablers of data sharing. Scientists do not make their data electronically available to others for various reasons, including insufficient time and lack of funding. Most respondents are satisfied with their current processes for the initial and short-term parts of the data or research lifecycle (collecting their research data; searching for, describing or cataloging, analyzing, and short-term storage of their data) but are not satisfied with long-term data preservation. Many organizations do not provide support to their researchers for data management both in the short- and long-term. If certain conditions are met (such as formal citation and sharing reprints) respondents agree they are willing to share their data. There are also significant differences and approaches in data management practices based on primary funding agency, subject discipline, age, work focus, and world region.

Conclusions/significance: Barriers to effective data sharing and preservation are deeply rooted in the practices and culture of the research process as well as the researchers themselves. New mandates for data management plans from NSF and other federal agencies and world-wide attention to the need to share and preserve data could lead to changes. Large scale programs, such as the NSF-sponsored DataNET (including projects like DataONE) will both bring attention and resources to the issue and make it easier for scientists to apply sound data management principles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3126798PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021101PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data sharing
24
data
19
data management
16
sharing scientists
8
practices perceptions
8
sharing
6
practices
5
scientists
4
scientists practices
4
perceptions background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!