A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The contribution of an electronic conductivity device to the safety of pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis surgery. | LitMetric

Study Design: Retrospective, controlled clinical study.

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of an electronic conductivity device (ECD) to the safety of pedicle screw insertion in pediatric scoliosis surgery.

Summary Of Background Data: The implantation of pedicle screws in spinal deformity correction surgery has evolved into the currently predominant fixation technique. Methodologies for optimizing placement of pedicle screws are fluoroscopy, electromyography, and intraoperative image-based navigation. A hand-held ECD was recently introduced.

Methods: Pedicle screw insertion was analyzed in 248 pediatric scoliosis patients (idiopathic, congenital, neuromuscular, syndromatic). Group I included 150 procedures without the aid of the ECD and group II included 98 ECD-aided procedures. The two groups were matched by age, sex, etiology, Cobb angle, and surgical criteria. Data on screw position and concomitant neuromonitoring alarms were compared. Group I consisted of patients operated with both the hybrid construct and pedicle screw instrumentation, while group II consisted of patients operated solely with pedicle screws. Both groups were operated on by a single surgeon with the same neurophysiologic methodology. Clinically relevant misplaced pedicle screws were established by intraoperative monitoring alarms concomitant with pedicle screw insertion.

Results: A total of 1270 pedicle screw placements were analyzed in group I and compared with 1400 pedicle screw placements in group II. Neuromonitoring alarms concomitant with screw placement occurred in 10 procedures in group I (6.6%) compared with 3 in group II (3.0%). The contribution of the electronic device to reducing the number of neurophysiologic alarms was significant (P = 0.048, Fisher exact test). Nine of the 13 monitoring alarms (69%) were associated with implantation adjacent to the apex of the spinal curve.

Conclusion: The use of an ECD significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant misplaced screws in a variety of scoliosis patients, thereby increasing the safety of pedicle screw implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822a82ecDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle screw
32
pedicle screws
16
contribution electronic
12
pedicle
12
safety pedicle
12
screw insertion
12
screw
10
electronic conductivity
8
conductivity device
8
pediatric scoliosis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!