AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to identify the importance of the duration of invasive ventilation and of renal replacement therapy for short-term prognosis of surgical patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We analyzed adult patients (n = 1462) who had an ICU length of stay of more than 4 days and who were followed up until the end of the short-term phase after ICU admission. Duration of different invasive therapies was evaluated by constructing specific vectors that tested effects of time-dependent variables on outcome after a lag time of 7 days.

Measurements And Main Results: Eight hundred eight patients (56.6%) were still alive at the end of the short-term phase. During the short-term phase, 85.3% of the 1462 patients required invasive ventilation, and 16.1%, a continuous renal replacement therapy. Besides the underlying disease and disease severity at ICU admission, the need for invasive ventilation or renal replacement therapy was associated with poorer outcome. Duration of invasive ventilation shortened survival if treatment lasted for more than 11 days (nonlinear association). In contrast, duration of renal replacement therapy was unimportant for short-term prognosis.

Conclusion: Prolonged duration of invasive ventilation but not of renal replacement therapy is inversely related to short-term survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

duration invasive
20
invasive ventilation
20
renal replacement
20
replacement therapy
20
ventilation renal
12
short-term phase
12
short-term prognosis
8
surgical patients
8
icu admission
8
short-term
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!