Background: Chronically elevated blood glucose levels are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many diabetes patients will eventually require insulin treatment to maintain good glycaemic control. There are still uncertainties about the optimal insulin treatment regimens for type 2 diabetes, but the long-acting insulin analogues seem beneficial. Several reviews have compared either insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin, but research directly comparing both insulin analogues is limited.
Objectives: To assess the effects of insulin detemir and insulin glargine compared with each other in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Search Strategy: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, online registries of ongoing trials and abstract books. Date of last search was January 2011.
Selection Criteria: All randomised controlled trials comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine with a duration of 12 weeks or longer were included.
Data Collection And Analysis: Two authors independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis was performed.
Main Results: This review examined four trials lasting 24 to 52 weeks involving 2250 people randomised to either insulin detemir or glargine. Overall, risk of bias of the evaluated studies was high. Insulin glargine was dosed once-daily in the evening. Insulin detemir was initiated once-daily in the evening with the option of an additional dose in the morning in three studies and initiated twice-daily in one study. Of randomised patients 13.6% to 57.2% were injecting insulin detemir twice-daily at the end of trial.Glycaemic control, measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and HbA1c equal to or less than 7% with or without hypoglycaemia, did not differ statistically significantly between treatment groups.The results showed no significant differences in overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia between treatment groups.Insulin detemir was associated with less weight gain. Treatment with insulin glargine resulted in a lower daily basal insulin dose and a lower number of injection site reactions.There was no significant difference in the variability of FPG or glucose values in 24-hour profiles between treatment groups. It was not possible to draw conclusions on quality of life, costs or mortality. Only one trial reported results on health-related quality of life and showed no significant differences between treatment groups.
Authors' Conclusions: Our analyses suggest that there is no clinically relevant difference in efficacy or safety between insulin detemir and insulin glargine for targeting hyperglycaemia. However, to achieve the same glycaemic control insulin detemir was often injected twice-daily in a higher dose but with less weight gain, while insulin glargine was injected once-daily, with somewhat fewer injection site reactions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6486036 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006383.pub2 | DOI Listing |
Diabetes Ther
December 2024
Abteilung für Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Gastroenterologie und Klinische Forschung, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany.
Introduction: Appropriate glycemic control is paramount for people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D) by the effective delivery of exogenous insulin. However, glycemic variability and the risk of severe hypoglycemia must be reliably controlled.
Methods: COMET-T is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland during 2021-2022 to assess the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) after switching from other basal insulins.
Am J Health Syst Pharm
November 2024
University of Texas College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA.
Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Diabetes Endocrinol
September 2024
Department of Diabetes, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease caused by destruction of pancreatic islet beta-cells. There is significant residual beta-cell function, measured through circulating C-peptide, present at the time of T1D diagnosis but this subsequently decreases with time. Higher residual beta-cell function at diagnosis associates with better glycaemic control and less glucose variability, and later in the disease course with less hypoglycaemia, lower glucose variability and fewer microvascular complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomedicines
August 2024
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Background: One hundred years have passed since the discovery of insulin, which is one of the most relevant events of the 20th century. This period resulted in extraordinary progress in the development of novel molecules to improve glucose control, simplify the insulin regimen, and ameliorate the quality of life. In late March 2024, the first once-weekly basal analog Icodec was approved for diabetes mellitus, generating high expectations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!