Purpose: To evaluate the variability in shade selection for general practitioners (GPs) and postgraduate (MDS) practitioners and to assess if a shade selection bias exists.

Materials And Methods: 2070 samples of the chosen shade(s) by 31 GPs and 18 MDS practitioners in the form of work authorization forms and slips were collected from dental laboratories. The mouth was divided into four quadrants: maxillary anteriors and posteriors, and mandibular anteriors and posteriors. The data was grouped and analyzed.

Results: The same shade or combination was repeated by the GPs and the MDS practitioners 38% and 35% of the time, respectively. The GP group prescribed a single shade in 84% of cases and a combination of two shades per tooth in 14% of cases, in contrast to the MDS practitioners, who prescribed a single shade in 51% of cases and two shades in 47% of cases.

Conclusion: A shade selection bias exists among both general and MDS practitioners, as a particular shade or combination was repeated a significant number of times. However, MDS practitioners use a combination of two shades more frequently than general practitioners, who rely mostly on a single shade for a tooth.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mds practitioners
24
shade selection
16
single shade
12
shade
9
variability shade
8
practitioners
8
general practitioners
8
selection bias
8
gps mds
8
anteriors posteriors
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Information on care home residents in England is captured in numerous data sets (care home records, General Practitioner records, community nursing, etc.) but little of this information is currently analysed in a way that is useful for care providers, current or future residents and families or that realises the potential of data to enhance care provision. The DACHA study aimed to develop and test a minimum data set (MDS) which would bring together data that is useful to support and improve care and facilitate research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A smart tool for non expert clinicians for the dissemination of the MDS criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy.

Neurol Sci

January 2025

Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.

Due to the variety of clinical phenotypes and the massive clinical overlap with other neurodegenerative diseases, the diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) remains a major challenge. Notwithstanding, early and reliable clinical diagnosis of PSP is highly warranted for estimation of prognosis, appropriate allocation to therapeutic trials and development of new diagnostic tools. As reliable biomarkers are lacking, PSP diagnosis relies on the application of the clinical criteria promoted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adequate knowledge and awareness regarding diseases are essential for appropriate, high-quality healthcare. Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) is a non-sexually transmitted gynaecological disease that is caused by the presence of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in the female genital tract and the resulting immune response that causes tissue damage. It is estimated to affect 56 million women, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where healthcare workers (HCWs) have limited awareness and knowledge of FGS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Not much is known about how one's understanding of words may differ with age. Here we explore how epistemic adverbs - as used in health communication to indicate degrees of uncertainty and risk - are understood by older and younger monolingual speakers of Australian English.

Methods: We used an online dissimilarity rating task with sentence pairs presented as first and second doctor opinions which differed only with respect to the embedded epistemic adverbs (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Promoting oral cancer screening by general practitioners in Australia: Strengthening primary healthcare.

Aust J Gen Pract

December 2024

BOralHtlh, GCertDenThrpy, MPH, MSc (Clin Ed), Senior Policy and Research Officer, Dental Health Services Victoria, Melbourne, Vic; Casual Research Fellow, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic; School of Population Health and Preventive Medicine, Health Economics Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic.

Background: Oral cancer remains a significant public health issue. General practitioners (GPs) can play an important role in raising awareness of oral cancer.

Objective: This paper explores why providing advice relating to modifiable risk behaviours associated with oral cancer and undertaking routine oral cancer screening are important for GPs in clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!