A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of carbon monoxide leaks on the measurement error of total haemoglobin mass. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Total haemoglobin mass (Hb(mass)) can be accurately measured using a CO rebreathing method, but measurement errors can vary across different labs, possibly due to CO leaks.
  • A study implemented a standardized leak monitoring procedure with two CO detectors to assess the impact of these leaks on Hb(mass) measurements in previous test-retest studies.
  • Results showed that measurement error was lowest without any leaks (1.9%), increased with minor leaks (3.6%), and dramatically rose with major leaks (9.3%), suggesting that careful leak monitoring is crucial to ensure accurate Hb(mass) assessments.

Article Abstract

Total haemoglobin mass (Hb(mass)) can be assessed with low measurement error using carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing. However, variability in measurement error of Hb(mass) has been reported across laboratories and it has previously been suggested that CO leaks contribute to this variability. As a result of employing a standardized leak monitoring procedure using two CO detectors, we were able to retrospectively examine the impact of CO leaks on Hb(mass) values from past test-retest studies in our laboratory using the optimized CO rebreathing method. Test-retest data were collected to determine measurement error, with subjects tested twice within 5 days. Test-retest data were placed into separate categories based on magnitude and duration of CO leak observed during one of the two tests. The No Leak category contained test-retest data in which no leak occurred during either test. The Minor Leak category contained test-retest data in which one of the tests had a CO leak of magnitude less than 30 ppm and less than 5 seconds duration, whereas the Major Leak category included test-retest data in which a leak greater than this magnitude or duration occurred. Measurement error was lowest in the No Leak category (1.9%; 95%CI: 1.6-2.3%; n = 56), approximately doubled in the Minor Leaks category (3.6%; 95%CI: 2.6-6.1%; n = 13), and dramatically increased in the Major Leaks category (9.3%; 95%CI: 6.3-17.6%; n = 10). We recommend careful monitoring of potential CO leaks using multiple detectors. To minimize measurement error, tests in which any CO leak is detected should be excluded.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2011.589008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurement error
24
test-retest data
20
leak category
16
tests leak
12
leak
10
carbon monoxide
8
total haemoglobin
8
haemoglobin mass
8
magnitude duration
8
category contained
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!