A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Left ventricular function-conduction impairment as reflected by the ECG in chronic aortic regurgitation. | LitMetric

The study was conducted to ascertain that the ECG assists in the assessment of systolic dysfunction in chronic aortic regurgitation. Five variables were reviewed in 146 adults without bundle branch block who underwent angiocardiography: total 12-lead QRS amplitude, QRS duration, maximum R peak time in I, V5 or V6, maximum R peak time relative to S peak time of the maximum S in V1, V2 or V3, and maximum T wave amplitude and polarity in I, V6 or aVF. In order to define which of them could differentiate left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% (n = 101) from EF <50% (n = 45) they were subjected to stepwise linear discriminant analysis. The maximum R peak time relative to S peak time emerged as the most promising variable. In predicting EF <50%, R peak time prolongation exceeding S peak time, i.e. R peak delay, yields reliable results, with specificity, positive and negative predictive value being 89.1%, 70.3% and 82.6%, respectively, and sensitivity being 57.8%. As given by the sample odds-ratio, R peak delay indicates an 11-fold increased risk of having EF <50%. R peak delay, a marker of left ventricular function-conduction impairment identifies patients who need valve replacement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-011-0004-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peak time
12
left ventricular
8
chronic aortic
8
aortic regurgitation
8
maximum peak
8
time maximum
8
ventricular function-conduction
4
function-conduction impairment
4
impairment reflected
4
reflected ecg
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!