AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluates how effective and safe radical trachelectomy (RT) is compared to radical hysterectomy (RH) for treating early cervical cancer.
  • The analysis included three clinical trials with 587 women, finding no significant differences in recurrence rates, survival rates, or complications between the two surgeries.
  • However, RT was associated with less blood loss, quicker recovery of normal urinary function, shorter hospital stays, and better chances of retaining fertility compared to RH.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of radical trachelectomy (RT) and radical hysterectomy (RH) for patients with early cervical cancer.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Population: Women who had early cervical cancer.

Methods: Prospective controlled clinical trials comparing RT with RH were identified using a predefined search strategy. Recurrence, five-year recurrence-free survival rate, five-year overall survival rate, postoperative mortality, intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two operations were compared by using the methods provided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Results: Three controlled clinical trials involving 587 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in recurrence rate [1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-3.28, p=0.47], five-year recurrence-free survival rate (1.17; 95% CI 0.54-2.53, p=0.69), five-year overall survival rate (0.86; 95% CI 0.30-2.43, p=0.78), postoperative mortality (1.14; 95% CI 0.42-3.11, p=0.80), intraoperative complications (1.66; 95% CI 0.11-25.28, p=0.72), postoperative complications (0.52; 95% CI 0.11-2.48, p=0.41), blood transfusion (0.29; 95% CI 0.06-1.36, p=0.12) and number of harvested lymph nodes. However, RT, compared with RH, reduced blood loss and shortened duration to normal urine residual volume and postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, RT may achieve to normal conception rates, while RH makes patients sterile.

Conclusions: Radical trachelectomy has similar efficacy and safety to RH as the surgical treatment for early cervical cancer. Moreover, it reduced blood loss and shortened the duration to normal urine residual volumes and postoperative hospital stay. Radical trachelectomy can be used to treat early stage cervical cancer as an alternative operation for patients who wish to preserve fertility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01231.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical trachelectomy
16
early cervical
16
survival rate
16
cervical cancer
12
radical hysterectomy
8
treatment early
8
systematic review
8
efficacy safety
8
controlled clinical
8
clinical trials
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!