Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the efficacy and efficiency in providing critical care to hospitalized patients in teaching vs nonteaching intensive care units (ICUs) in Colombia.

Methods: A prospective cohort observational study was conducted.

Location: This study was conducted in 11 teaching and 8 nonteaching ICUs. From June 1 until December 31, 2005, data on 826 patients admitted consecutively to teaching ICUs and 825 patients admitted to nonteaching ICUs were analyzed.

Measurements: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, ICU discharge status (dead or alive) and ICU length of stay, and standardized mortality ratios were considered in this study. A logistic regression and robust linear regression were performed.

Results: There were no differences in mortality (P = .25). Standardized mortality was less than 1 for both types of units. The teaching ICUs length of stay was 1 day longer (P < .01). Resource use is 25% higher in teaching units (P = .01). When the Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score on the last day was from 21 to 35, a higher ratio of patients from the nonteaching ICUs was observed going floor or home when discharged from the ICU (P < .01).

Conclusions: Nonteaching ICUs discharge patients earlier than do teaching ICUs, but the effect of it remains to be clarified with further studies addressing questions as what happens after ICU discharge.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nonteaching icus
16
teaching nonteaching
12
teaching icus
12
critical care
8
nonteaching intensive
8
intensive care
8
care units
8
prospective cohort
8
cohort observational
8
observational study
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates antibiotic prescribing practices in adult ICUs across Brazil to address the issues related to multidrug-resistant infections in low- and middle-income countries.* -
  • A survey conducted in 58 ICUs found that 63.9% of the 620 patients were on antibiotics, with 72.3% receiving empirical treatment, indicating a lack of reliance on microbiological testing.* -
  • The findings show a high incidence of pneumonia and bloodstream infections, with significant variations in antibiotic use between teaching and non-teaching hospitals, raising concerns about healthcare-associated infections.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Hand hygiene (HH), the core element in infection prevention in healthcare, especially for multidrug resistant organism's transmission. The role of HH audits and HH adherence rates in the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in resource limited settings, are yet to be established.

Methods: A nationwide multicenter study was conducted in India, involving public, private, teaching and non-teaching COVID healthcare facilities (COVID-HCFs) using the IBhar mobile application based on WHO's hand hygiene audit tool.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intensive Care Unit Services Preparedness for the Pandemic: An Efficiency Analysis.

Health Serv Insights

September 2021

Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences (FEAS), Hacettepe University, Beytepe Ankara, Turkey.

Intensive care unit (ICU) services efficiency and the shortage of critical care professionals has been a challenge during pandemic. Thus, preparing ICUs is a prominent part of any pandemic response. The objective of this study is to examine the efficiencies of ICU services in Turkey right before the pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The overall use of intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States has been steadily increasing and is associated with tremendous health care costs. We suspect that the burden of ICU utilization after elective infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB) procedures is high, despite relatively low risks of complications in the immediate postoperative period. We sought to identify the burden of ICU utilization after elective LEB in patients with claudication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.

Crit Care Med

August 2019

CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires hospitals to report compliance with a sepsis treatment bundle as part of its Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. We used recently released data from this program to characterize national performance on the sepsis measure, known as SEP-1.

Design: Cross-sectional study of United States hospitals participating in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!