A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Early evaluation of cancer response by a new functional biomarker: apparent diffusion coefficient. | LitMetric

Early evaluation of cancer response by a new functional biomarker: apparent diffusion coefficient.

AJR Am J Roentgenol

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Hai Dian District, Beijing, China.

Published: July 2011

Objective: The purpose of this article is to investigate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) might be used as a universal biomarker for response evaluation in different tumors.

Subjects And Methods: Twenty-one patients with lung cancer, 12 patients with esophageal cancer, 19 patients with liver metastases, 24 patients with gastric cancer, and 26 patients with rectal cancer were recruited to the study. Percentage changes in the ADC and changes in the size of responding and nonresponding lesions of different tumors after treatment were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: There was no significant difference among the percentage ADC changes of different tumors (F = 1.57; p = 0.192). Clear differences were seen in the percentage ADC changes between responding and nonresponding tumors (F = 21.62; p < 0.001), which were significant at every time point after the start of treatment (early time point, F = 19.75 and p < 0.001; middle time point, F = 11.23 and p = 0.001; and later time point, F = 15.98 and p < 0.001). The percentage size changes after treatment between responding and nonresponding tumors were significantly different (F = 19.38; p < 0.001). However, at the early time point after treatment, the difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.02; p = 0.894).

Conclusion: The ADC changes correlated with treatment response in five types of body tumor but were independent of the tumor's location. Early increases in ADC during treatment indicate good response to treatment. ADC change is a promising biomarker for detecting therapeutic responses at an early stage that could be widely used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4912DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time point
20
adc changes
16
cancer patients
12
responding nonresponding
12
apparent diffusion
8
diffusion coefficient
8
percentage adc
8
nonresponding tumors
8
0001 time
8
early time
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!