Effects of casoxin 4 on morphine inhibition of small animal intestinal contractility and gut transit in the mouse.

Clin Exp Gastroenterol

CSIRO Preventative Health National Research Flagship, Adelaide, Australia;

Published: July 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how chronic opioid use, specifically morphine, causes constipation by affecting intestinal contractions in mice, rats, and guinea pigs.
  • The researchers tested the effectiveness of various opioid antagonists to counteract the inhibitory effects of morphine on gut movement, both in lab settings and with oral delivery methods.
  • Results showed that guinea pig tissue was particularly sensitive to morphine, and while some antagonists were effective in vitro, their oral administration did not effectively counteract morphine's impact on intestinal transit.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Chronic opioid analgesia has the debilitating side-effect of constipation in human patients. The major aims of this study were to: 1) characterize the opioid-specific antagonism of morphine-induced inhibition of electrically driven contraction of the small intestine of mice, rats, and guinea pigs; and 2) test if the oral delivery of small milk-derived opioid antagonist peptides could block morphine-induced inhibition of intestinal transit in mice.

Methods: Mouse, rat, and guinea pig intact ileal sections were electrically stimulated to contract and inhibited with morphine in vitro. Morphine inhibition was then blocked by opioid subtype antagonists in the mouse and guinea pig. Using a polymeric dye, Poly R-478, the opioid antagonists casoxin 4 and lactoferroxin A were tested orally for blocking activity of morphine inhibition of gut transit in vivo by single or double gavage techniques.

Results: The guinea pig tissue was more sensitive to morphine inhibition compared with the mouse or the rat (IC(50) [half maximal inhibitory concentration] values as nmol/L ± SEM were 34 ± 3, 230 ± 13, and 310 ± 14 respectively) (P < 0.01). The inhibitory influence of opioid agonists (IC(50)) in electrically driven ileal mouse preparations were DADLE ([D-Ala(2), D-Leu(5)]-enkephalin) ≥ met-enkephalin ≥ dynorphin A ≥ DAMGO ([D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Glyol(5)]-enkephalin) > morphine > morphiceptin as nmol/L 13.9, 17.3, 19.5, 23.3, 230, and 403 respectively. The mouse demonstrated predominantly κ- and δ-opioid receptor activity with a smaller μ-opioid receptor component. Both mouse and guinea pig tissue were sensitive to casoxin 4 antagonism of morphine inhibition of contraction. In contrast to naloxone, relatively high oral doses of the μ-opioid receptor antagonists, casoxin 4 and lactoferroxin A, applied before and after morphine injection were unable to antagonize morphine inhibition of gut transit.

Conclusions: Casoxin 4 reverses morphine-induced inhibition of contraction in mice and guinea pigs in vitro but fails to influence morphine inhibition of mouse small intestinal transit by the oral route.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108675PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S16161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

morphine inhibition
28
guinea pig
16
morphine-induced inhibition
12
morphine
10
inhibition
10
gut transit
8
mouse
8
electrically driven
8
guinea pigs
8
intestinal transit
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!