Geometries, ligand binding energies, electronic structure, and excitation spectra are determined for Au(4)(PR(3))(4)(2+) and Au(4)(μ(2)-I)(2)(PR(3))(4) clusters (R = PH(3), PMe(3), and PPh(3)). Density functionals including SVWN5, Xα, OPBE, LC-ωPBE, TPSS, PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, and SAOP are employed with basis sets ranging from LANL2DZ to SDD to TZVP. Metal--metal and metal--ligand bond distances are calculated and compared with experiment. The effect of changing the phosphine ligands is assessed for geometries and excitation spectra. Standard DFT and hybrid ONIOM calculations are employed for geometry optimizations with PPh(3) groups. The electronic structure of the gold--phosphine clusters examined in this work is analyzed in terms of cluster ("superatom") orbitals and d-band orbitals. Transitions out of the d band are significant in the excitation spectra. The use of different basis sets and DFT functionals leads to noticeable variations in the relative intensities of strong transitions, although the overall spectral profile remains qualitatively unchanged. The replacement of PMe(3) with PPh(3) changes the nature of the electronic transitions in the cluster due to low-lying π*-orbitals. To reproduce the experimental geometries of clusters with PPh(3) ligands, computationally less expensive PH(3) or PMe(3) ligands are sufficient for geometry optimizations. However, to predict cluster excitation spectra, the full PPh(3) ligand must be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200346cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

excitation spectra
16
au4pr342+ au4μ2-i2pr34
8
electronic structure
8
ph3 pme3
8
pme3 pph3
8
basis sets
8
geometry optimizations
8
pph3
5
density functional
4
functional analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!