Accuracy of electromyography needle placement in cadavers: non-guided vs. ultrasound guided.

Muscle Nerve

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Published: July 2011

Introduction: Accuracy of needle electromyography is typically ensured by use of anatomical landmarks and auditory feedback related to voluntary activation of the targeted muscle; however, in certain clinical situations, landmarks may not be palpable, auditory feedback may be limited or not present, and targeting a specific muscle may be more critical. In such settings, image guidance might significantly enhance accuracy.

Methods: Two electromyographers with different levels of experience examined 14 muscles in each of 4 fresh-frozen cadaver lower limbs. Each muscle was tested a total of eight times; four fine wires were inserted without ultrasound (US) guidance and four were inserted under US guidance. Overall accuracy as well as accuracy rates for the individual electromyographers were calculated.

Results: Non-guided needle placement was significantly less accurate than US-guided needle placement, particularly in the hands of less experienced electromyographers, supporting the use of real-time US guidance in certain challenging situations in the electromyography laboratory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.22008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

needle placement
12
auditory feedback
8
accuracy
4
accuracy electromyography
4
needle
4
electromyography needle
4
placement cadavers
4
cadavers non-guided
4
non-guided ultrasound
4
ultrasound guided
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!