A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Treatment with calcimimetic (cinacalcet) alters epoetin dosage requirements in dialysis patients: preliminary report. | LitMetric

Background: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), known complication of chronic renal failure, in addition to effects on bone and cardiovascular systems, is associated with reduced response to erythropoietin (EPO). Calcimimetics such as cinacalcet are the latest generation of drugs used in the treatment of SHPT. Few studies have evaluated the effect of cinacalcet on anemia associated with SHPT in dialysis patients, while no study has compared this cinacalcet effect with that of vitamin D analogs such as paricalcitol.

Patients And Methods: Using a retrospective chart-based review of dialysis patients' records to identify patients being treated with either cinacalcet or paricalcitol alone, matched for the same EPO treatment, which had been followed for 1 year, we have evaluated the effect of cinacalcet on anemia compared to that of paricalcitol.

Results: Ten patient records were found that fit the criteria, five treated with cinacalcet (Group 1) and five treated with paricalcitol (Group 2), all treated with the same dose of darbepoetin. Darbepoetin dosage was the only parameter that significantly changed between groups, decreasing in Group 1 (-33%, p = 0.009) while remaining unchanged in Group 2. PTH-level reduction, which was significant versus baseline in both groups, although not statistically different between groups, was higher with cinacalcet.

Conclusion: The combination of lower EPO dose in cinacalcet-treated patients compared with paricalcitol-treated patients, along with good SHPT control is a novel information and might have considerable benefits in dialysis patients not only preventing bone (fractures) and cardiovascular system (calcifications) damages but also in terms of cost savings via a reduction of EPO dosage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2011.589937DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dialysis patients
12
evaluated cinacalcet
8
cinacalcet anemia
8
treated cinacalcet
8
group treated
8
cinacalcet
7
patients
6
treatment calcimimetic
4
calcimimetic cinacalcet
4
cinacalcet alters
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!