AI Article Synopsis

  • The acidity of malignant tumors contributes to their invasiveness and spread, and while oral bicarbonate has shown potential to inhibit metastasis in breast cancer models, its effectiveness has limitations.
  • Dichloroacetate (DCA) is thought to improve the safety and effectiveness of bicarbonate by targeting tumor cells and reducing acidity, but in trials with mice, using DCA alone or with bicarbonate didn’t lead to improved tumor control or survival rates.
  • Though bicarbonate-based therapies showed promising survival benefits and reduced tumor lesions, the combination with DCA did not significantly improve outcomes, highlighting the complexity of cancer treatment and the need for further research on DCA’s role in different tumor environments.

Article Abstract

Background: The glycolytic nature of malignant tumors contributes to high levels of extracellular acidity in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor acidity is a driving force in invasion and metastases. Recently, it has been shown that buffering of extracellular acidity through systemic administration of oral bicarbonate can inhibit the spread of metastases in a mouse model for metastatic breast cancer. While these findings are compelling, recent assessments into the use of oral bicarbonate as a cancer intervention reveal limitations.

Methods: We posited that safety and efficacy of bicarbonate could be enhanced by dichloroacetate (DCA), a drug that selectively targets tumor cells and reduces extracellular acidity through inhibition of glycolysis. Using our mouse model for metastatic breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), we designed an interventional survival study where tumor bearing mice received bicarbonate, DCA, or DCA-bicarbonate (DB) therapies chronically.

Results: Dichloroacetate alone or in combination with bicarbonate did not increase systemic alkalosis in mice. Survival was longest in mice administered bicarbonate-based therapies. Primary tumor re-occurrence after surgeries is associated with survival rates. Although DB therapy did not significantly enhance oral bicarbonate, we did observe reduced pulmonary lesion diameters in this cohort. The DCA monotherapy was not effective in reducing tumor size or metastases or improving survival time. We provide in vitro evidence to suggest this outcome may be a function of hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment.

Conclusions: DB combination therapy did not appear to enhance the effect of chronic oral bicarbonate. The anti-tumor effect of DCA may be dependent on the cancer model. Our studies suggest DCA efficacy is unpredictable as a cancer therapy and further studies are necessary to determine the role of this agent in the tumor microenvironment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125283PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-235DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral bicarbonate
16
mouse model
12
model metastatic
12
metastatic breast
12
breast cancer
12
extracellular acidity
12
bicarbonate
8
tumor
8
tumor microenvironment
8
cancer
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!