Purpose Of Review: To review the reported effectiveness and safety of transobturator (TransOburator route, TOR) versus retropubic (retropubic tape) synthetic mid-urethral slings discussing the controversy existing on which of these procedures is best.
Recent Findings: From August 2009 to January 2011 three meta-analyses of the pertinent topic were identified. They concluded that TOR was less favourable than the retropubic tape in objective cure rates without any significant difference in subjective cure rates. Moreover TOR showed a shorter operating time and less serious perioperative complications than retropubic tape, also when using a standardized complications grading system. The most recent RCTs confirmed these results.
Summary: TOR showed similar short and mid-term subjective cure rates compared to retropubic tape; with a shorter operating time and a lower risk of perioperative complications. Subjective cure rates and patient satisfaction are crucial, thus, patient-report outcomes should be used as the primary outcome measure for all trials of incontinence treatments. The absence of standard methods for assessment of anti-incontinence procedures and the use of different methods to evaluate safety and effectiveness led to reporting of different rates of success and complications for the same procedure, making it difficult to compare data, to draw conclusions or make recommendations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283476edb | DOI Listing |
Facts Views Vis Obgyn
December 2024
Background: Stress urinary incontinence is a frequent condition in female patients. Surgical treatment with tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) insertion is a minimally invasive option with immediate improvement of symptoms. Different possible complications have been described in the literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Womens Health
November 2024
Department of Gynecology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Neurourol Urodyn
November 2024
Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
November 2024
Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Mid urethral sling (MUS) surgery is a widely accepted and safe procedure performed for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with excellent cure rate besides its minimal complications. There are various types of MUS which can be offered. In this review we collated published data on MUS surgery performed among Taiwanese women with SUI in search for the best techniques and its outcome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urogynecol J
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, North Tower, Foothills Medical Center, 1441 - 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4J8, Canada.
Introduction And Hypothesis: The objective was to determine if mid-urethral sling (MUS) tensioning with a Mayo Scissor as a sub-urethral spacer compared with a Babcock clamp holding a loop of tape under the urethra results in differences in patient-reported outcomes and rates of repeat surgery over a 5-year follow-up.
Methods: Follow-up 5 years after a randomized clinical trial, utilizing primary data collection linked to administrative health data, was carried out to create a longitudinal cohort. The primary outcome was participant-reported bothersome SUI symptoms, as defined by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) questionnaire.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!