Current theories of representation of 3-D objects assume that they are geometrical facsimiles of represented objects and, therefore, imply that various aspects of the representations are as concordant as are those of the objects themselves. Empirical data presented here question this as they show that subjects' choices of distinct views of objects are not mutually concordant. This being so, it seems unlikely that a facsimile representation of a solid yields a full description of the process of representation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p6748 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
representation
4
representation solids
4
solids note
4
note current
4
current theories
4
theories representation
4
representation 3-d
4
objects
4
3-d objects
4
objects assume
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!